SMALL STEP FOR MAN, BIG STEP FOR HUMANITY?.part-1

SMALL STEP FOR MAN, BIG STEP FOR HUMANITY?.part-1

OK, this is going to sound completely crazy. Heliocentric (sphere) model
of land is wrong. I know, I know, you’re telling yourself I’m a creep, yes
I’m not in my right mind to believe a conspiracy theory. But bear with me
me, you may find that you are the one who believes the theory
conspiracies.
Well, before I begin, I’d like to make it clear that I’m not advocating existence
flat land, but I allow for the possibility that not everything is as it is for us
taught. And there is more than enough food for thought.
Some of the facts of the geocentric model of the earth are bursting
open questions, so you are like many other people who are obscuring
veil of possible deception, I can’t help but question the
established version – and if I still want to believe that it’s all together
completely pointless. Actually, I was at first – when he is my friend
mentioned this theory – sure to disprove it in no time and at the same time
laughed heartily, because even as a little boy I saw more
a picture of the blue marble on which they were supposed to live. I’m sure you are
have seen them yourself, but do you know that practically none of these
picture is not real, which even NASA itself admitted? Namely, pictures
computer generated in “Photoshop” or beautified,
are composite or assembled, as they say themselves. These pictures are
consisting of several pieces or strips and, for example, embellished with added
clouds and repaired land, but sometimes it is the whole earth
computer-aided against the dark background of space.
One has to ask why they would do such a thing at NASA. What isn’t
easier and above all more honestly easy to press the trigger
on a high resolution camera? It is not a little strange that in all these
years, scientific research could not present a single real one
high-resolution images of the earth or return to the moon? It’s landing
happened on the moon at all? Doubts are already raised by an incredible fact, yes
did nasa lose all the plans and videos of the apollo missions, so
all documentation or physical evidence that is supposed to prove itself
the moon landing, which is without a doubt the most important event of the 20th century.
centuries. Also the moon rock that Aldrin and Armstrong donated
to Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum, has proven to be nothing more than a piece of junk
earthy petrified wood. If you have this information
don’t raise your eyebrows and don’t suspect indecent acts, you don’t have to
help. You will always believe whatever is served to you without evidence
the establishment.

The moon flight was not covered by independent broadcasters,
all video and audio material released to the public was regulated
by NASA and previously reviewed by authorities. TV houses that are
were transmitting the landing, they could not connect directly to the transmission,
instead, they were forced to transmit the events from the projection screen
canvas, as they did 30 years before. The live broadcast is also from
twisted vines, as the broadcast material was pre-edited, quality
the pictures are very poor and in black and white. I believe you know why.
Until now, few have undertaken a rigorous examination
of these recordings, but with the advancement of technology, so is that
came up. To begin with, let’s take a look at the photographer. It is interesting
that there are only two photographs of her from the famous spacewalk
the man whose first step on the moon reverberated around the world.
In addition, since Neil Armstrong in almost fifty years after that
practically not a single interview could be squeezed out of the event.
Except for the first press conference and some spoken words
he did not appear in front of the camera at the anniversary celebration. But where
appeared, it looked like he and his colleagues would
extremely painful and uncomfortable for the astronauts. I don’t know, maybe they do
enough lies and their conscience stings, because in the videos it really looks like
as if they were involuntary participants in this circus. In short, look
watch recordings of press conferences on the Internet and judge for yourself.
Long-time NASA director James Webb is also without an explanation
resigned just days before the first Apollo mission left
earth’s orbit, namely only half a year before the first flight to the moon.
But why should a man who has dedicated the last decade of his life
Apollo mission, did something like that just before the biggest event
his career or 20th century? Last but not least, they are all three
astronauts resign after returning to earth. Mentioned
but of course it is not yet the proof we are looking for.

Let me say that photographic anomalies are distinguished by understanding
light and shadows. And the matter on the moon is simple. all the light
needed for photographers ran, the sun contributed. Artificial lights
they were not used on the moon. With a review of the shadows that would be in the mentioned
in the case of the must – regardless of the landscape – always take place
parallel, it can be found that in many pictures these run in
in different directions, which is impossible with one light source, so it is
there was a secondary source of illumination. Camera reticle
is partially obscured by objects in some pictures or is in the background
which is also impossible if the image is not manipulated artificially. Right
it is also amazing that none of the background images contain stars,
which should look exceptional in a non-atmosphere setting. That would
otherwise can be explained by the lighting setting, on the other hand
it would be nearly impossible to exactly duplicate the constellations
of stars according to the positions of the astronauts in which the background
constant variable. Any amateur astronomer could
alerted to the smallest measurement error. In addition, it was
The public rarely talks about stars, and that is the only thing it refers to
the reporter’s question at which Neil Armstrong “lost”
memory. Space, stars – hmm … yeah … OK!? And while they are
astronauts took three outrageously expensive cars to the moon
(dune buggies) worth a total of 60 million dollars, are at home
each time leaving a photographic telescope with which we could see quite a bit
farther into space than could be seen from earth in those days. Right
I wonder why they didn’t take him with them?
The fact that the vessel with which they landed is also more than telling
on the dusty ground of the moon, it left no trace there. Already alone
the dust raised by the engine on landing should be covered by a larger one
part of the vessel, but the pictures show that there are also landing legs
clean as a tear. Not to lose words about the crater, which would it
had to hollow out an engine with a thrust of almost 5000 kg, meanwhile
when the footsteps of the astronauts are clearly visible, especially the first step
on the moon it is made to the smallest detail. The biggest hurdle they had to face
surpassed by astronauts who flew in compared to today’s times
pixni is the Van Allen radiation belt. This is a radioactive environment,
which on average stretches between 1,000 and 60,000 km. To
astronauts survived crossing this deadly corridor, would
had to fly encased in lead. Namely, in contact with another metal
these radioactive particles produce deadly X-rays.
Let me add that technology has not yet found a solution for the safe
passing through it, which even Nasa itself admits. And yet it should
in 1969, the astronauts survived the trip without any consequences. All up until then
the American and Soviet space missions actually flew quite a lot
under it. The Soviets, for example, were also more experienced cosmonauts,
for every 20 US space hours completed, they had 100
hours of flights completed alone. Let me put things into perspective;
In 1957, the Soviets launched the first satellite (Sputnik), sent the first
an animal into space, then the first human, completed the first spacewalk,
sent the first team into space, then two vessels at once. Despite
however, the Soviets never landed on the moon. To be continued.

%d bloggers like this: